|
CASE STUDIES: Color Contaminants & Knit Lines
PELabs was hired by the molder for a major manufacturer of children's products
to find the cause for cracking of field-parts from a large production lot of
car-seat shells. Upon examining samples, our engineers first observed that the
cracks were occurring on a principal weld-line in the part (See photo in Figure
1). They listed poor molding conditions, possible material deficiencies,
contamination, degradation and too much regrind as possible causes. So, they
formulated a list of questions for the molder and laid out a testing program to
expose the culprit. The material was prime polypropylene (PP), and the molder
related that the problem was unique to this one lot that was molded under the
same conditions and percentage of regrind as previous good lots, but a new lot
of resin had been used.

Figure 1. Weld-line Crack in Injection-molded, Car-seat Shell
A DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) of three samples of resin one from
the virgin material in the silo, one from a part out of the questionable lot
that had not cracked, and the other from a cracked field sample. All showed
two melting peaks, one in the vicinity of 150-160°C, the melting point of the
specified PP, and another around 130-140°C, about where most high-density
polyethylenes melt. The presence of PE was confirmed with infrared
spectroscopy (IR). Comparison of the energy spent in melting the two species
indicated PE contents of 5-10% for the silo sample and the un-cracked sample,
while it was nearly 50% for the returned field sample.. A thorough review by
the molder uncovered that a railcar of PP had inadvertently been loaded into a
silo with a residual of PE in it.
Even small amounts of PE in PP can result in weak weld lines. Consider the
tensile data of Table I collected at PELabs for different levels of a 53-melt*
PE-carrier colorant in a 16-melt* PP. The tensile bars were molded with gates
at both ends, creating a weld line across each bar in the gauge length. (See
the photo in Figure 2.) Each Pure-PP specimen necked at the weld-line,
elongated a large distance and broke in the necked region, not necessarily at
the weld line. All specimens in every sample group having the PE colorant, on
the other hand, broke at the weld-line without necking, before the yield point
was reached. A photograph of typical specimens after testing is shown in
Figure 3.
Table 1. Weld-line Strength of Polypropylene with Colorant Having a Polyethylene Carrier.
| MATERIAL MIX |
STRENGTH, psi |
ELONGATION, % |
| YIELD |
BREAK |
| PURE PP |
4340 |
13.6 |
200 |
| 2% PE COLORANT IN PP |
3420 |
4.3 |
| 4% PE COLORANT IN PP |
3030 |
3.9 |
| 5% PE COLORANT IN PP |
3420 |
3.1 |
| 7% PE COLORANT IN PP |
2590 |
3.1 |
The data in Table 1 show the weld-line strength of PP to be reduced appreciably
(~25%) by the presence of even 2% of a colorant with a PE carrier. For
further results on this subject, see the article Effect of Colorant Carriers on
Strength of Weld Lines in Polypropylene in the TecH RESOURCES section of this
Website.

Figure 2. Double-Gated Tensile Bar Mold and Shot

Figure 3. From the Top, Tested Tensile Bars with No Colorant, 4% PP- and 4% PE -colorant.
markets served ·
services ·
case studies ·
company profile
contact us ·
tech resources ·
glossary ·
did you know ·
what's new ·
product development
© 2003 Plastics Engineering Laboratories.
PELabs respects your privacy.
We will not share your information with any third party. Period.
Powered by media firma.
|